Printer friendly version |
E-mail to a friend |
Updated Tuesday, August 11, 2009 1:44 PM
New osteoporosis drug cuts fracture risk
LINDA A. JOHNSON Associated Press
A first-of-its-kind osteoporosis drug lowers the risk of bone
fractures as well as or better than current medicines, studies in older
women and men with prostate cancer suggest. Wall Street sees
Amgen Inc.'s genetically engineered denosumab as a potential
blockbuster crucial to the company's future. But given the crowded
market of treatments for the bone-thinning disease, doctors see its
expected high cost as a big drawback. "It'll find a particular
niche where it'll be used, but I don't see it as taking over the
market," said Dr. Sundeep Khosla, a professor and osteoporosis
researcher at the Mayo Clinic not involved in the studies. Still,
he called the drug a "tour de force of modern molecular medicine"
because it is potent and was designed specifically to block one pathway
involved in the natural breakdown of bone cells. The Food and
Drug Administration on Tuesday released its review of denosumab, with
staff citing an elevated infection risk. That data comes just ahead of
a meeting Thursday when outside advisers will weigh the drug's safety
and effectiveness and recommend whether to approve it. In early afternoon trading, Amgen shares rose $1.36, or 2.2 percent, at $62.61 as the broader markets declined. Denosumab,
an injection just under the skin given only twice a year, would have to
compete against eight major types of pills and injected medicines,
including estrogen and generic and brand-name Fosamax, the first drug
approved for osteoporosis. Most of those must be given more
often, with pills swallowed once a day, week or month, a nasal spray
inhaled daily, and one injection under the skin given daily. But
another injection given intravenously is only needed once a year, and
estrogen, while out of fashion because of its link to breast cancer, is
available in skin patches changed once or twice a week. Those
drugs' retail prices can range from about $385 a year for generic
Fosamax, to between $1,130 and $1,350 for most brand-name pills, to
$11,100 a year for injected Forteo. Genetically engineered drugs, made
by altering a cell's DNA or other genetic material, all cost more than
$10,000 a year. Global sales of osteoporosis treatments,
including hundreds of vitamin brands, exceeded $8.3 billion last year,
according to data from IMS Health. Analyst Steve Brozak of WBB
Securities said denosumab should exceed the $1 billion a year sales
threshold for blockbusters, but it's unclear given the recession. "You're
going to have blowback by insurers" over how much they are willing to
pay, he said, but Amgen might try to charge more than $10,000 per year. Dr.
Lenore Buckley, a professor at Virginia Commonwealth University, said
all these drugs carry some risks. The studies found denosumab caused
eczema in some patients, and a dozen of the women got a serious skin
infection, cellulitis, that sometimes required hospitalization for
intravenous antibiotics. "Because this drug affects the immune
system, the long-term effects on cancer risk or immune function is
still unknown," she warned, saying she expects FDA will require Amgen
to track risks over time if the drug is approved. The effectiveness of denosumab and existing drugs appears to plateau after two or three years, she added. About 10 million Americans have osteoporosis, and another 44 million are at increased risk because of low bone density. The two studies were released online Tuesday by the New England Journal of Medicine. Both
were paid for by Amgen, of Thousand Oaks, Calif. Nearly all the
researchers receive consulting, advisory and other fees from the
company and competitors, or are Amgen employees. The biotech company
designed the studies, handled data collection and analysis, and helped
write the journal reports. One study included 7,868 women, aged
60 to 90, with moderate to severe osteoporosis. Half got denosumab
injections every six months for three years. They had 68 percent fewer
spine fractures and 40 percent fewer hip fractures than the other study
participants who were given dummy shots. The second study
included 1,468 men with prostate cancer at increased fracture risk due
to cancer hormone therapy, although 556 dropped out at some point for
reasons from side effects and cancer progression to the study being
extended from two to three years. Denosumab cut the risk of spine
fractures 62 percent over three years compared to dummy shots. Spine
bone density loss was far smaller for those given the drug. Until
recent years, studies of osteoporosis drugs just measured changes in
bone density, assumed to equate with lower risk of fracture. Newer
studies also measure fracture rates, but there are no head-to-head
studies comparing treatments — and probably won't be because the small
differences in fracture rates would require studies of tens of
thousands of patients. However, based on some prior studies,
independent experts say denosumab appears more effective at preventing
spine fractures than three older pills — Fosamax, Actonel and Boniva —
and calcitonin nasal sprays, which all use various pathways to slow
down or kill cells called osteoclasts that break down bone. Experts
think denosumab prevents spine fractures about as well as Reclast, an
injected drug that slows bone breakdown, and injected Forteo, the only
drug that stimulates bone-building cells called osteoblasts. And
denosumab appears to prevent fractures of the hip, forearm and ankle
about the same as those drugs. Dr. Jacob Warman, an osteoporosis
expert at Brooklyn Hospital Center, said he thinks denosumab might have
potential as an add-on to existing drugs to improve results even more.
He expects it would be covered that way by insurers, who commonly pay
for multiple medicines for other conditions. Amgen spokeswoman
Kerry Beth Daly said the company has not yet set a price for the drug,
but will try to keep it affordable. She said pricing also will reflect
denosumab's twice-a-year dose schedule, given that about half the
patients on existing drugs stop them within a year due to side effects
or trouble keeping up with dose schedules.
Comments ... 0 found!
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsibility of the authors. Heralddemocrat.com does not guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.
Comments do not display immediately due to manual review. Comments are reviewed periodically throughout the day. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
|
|
|
|